In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore,there is no compelling reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world' s population.There is plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.

      l also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example, rain forests produce oxygen, absorb carbon dioxide and stabilise the Earth's climate. 

      If we destroyed these areas, the costs of managing the resulting changes to our planet would far outweigh the costs of conservation.By protecting wild animals and their habitats, we maintain the natural balance of all life on Earth.In conclusion, we have no right to decide whether or not wild animals should exist, and I believe that we should do everything we can to protect them.

      本文由培訓無憂網新東方教育課程顧問整理發布，更多雅思課程信息歡迎關注培訓無憂網雅思培訓頻道或添加老師微信：15033336050

      注：尊重原創文章,轉載請注明出處和鏈接 http://m.hebeijilong.cn/news-id-7152.html 違者必究！部分文章來源于網絡由培訓無憂網編輯部人員整理發布,內容真實性請自行核實或聯系我們，了解更多相關資訊請關注雅思考試頻道查看更多，了解相關專業課程信息您可在線咨詢也可免費申請試課。關注官方微信了解更多：150 3333 6050